Autovelox e Duralex 
Italians are truly exceptional.
It is a law, you begin to implement it and now, magically, it turns out that's not good.
Even the simple things, those that seem common sense at all ... but as long as we do not touch each other in person, otherwise it is no longer good.
The lanes, for example.
To help the public transport to avoid traffic bottlenecks, states that are created may transit only lanes where buses, taxis and ambulances. It seems like a smart thing, supported, appreciated.
yet, just put it one, we see that motorists want to spend the same, even if they do not law. They begin to pass in the lane reserved happily and maybe even someone complains of this malpractice (someone who never goes in the car over there!). Then the Police Station sends a pair of auxiliary do some fine, well, by way 'of deterrence.
And that's where the madness is unleashed! They leave
fines and motorists do not accept them. They get angry with the auxiliary. Submit that they were "quite visible" and if the policeman on duty is not "quite visible" then the fines which are not valid ...
Here is where I wanted to go.
Italy is a country where the law applies only until proven otherwise. In case, it does not matter that a motorist has committed an offense and who has been sanctioned accordingly. No. There is invented to avoid the incredible fine. And the weirdest thing is that the concept goes! Ends up on television, with representatives of the committees of angry motorists who say "is not disputing the fact of having committed the offense: it is the way in which the fine was made that there is fine."
And why do not you well? On what principle? Obey the law if you do not check anyone? Then when you are not controlled, are you allowed to steal, evade taxes, to kill someone ?!?!?
It is argued that speed cameras are legitimate only if the position has been previously reported on the ministry and if there is a plethora of signs that warn of the location of the device.
But what's the point? "This road is subject to electronic speed control" on main roads ... you can do the fuck you think ... I do not know: it is a way of enforcing this law?
Here, I would like, the exact opposite of what was claimed by these gentlemen, that the monitoring of the traffic was absolutely invisible. That fines on offenders arrived without any justification other than the fact that they have committed an offense. You have exceeded limits? Fine. Have you mailed in a fast lane? Fine. Without vigilant visible. Without auxiliary fluorescent jacket. Without signs that forewarn the beginning of the road "look that we control."
If the law is correct, it should always be respected.
If it is not right, you fight to have it removed.
want the speed limit to 300 km / h? You want the buses and ambulances are incolonnino in traffic like everyone else? Well, take a collection of signatures, tantalise your politicians, let's hear, but say it! Say it clearly, instead of hiding behind some ridiculous excuses.
Otherwise do as that guy who says "if I tried is because we have with me, and if everything falls in prescription then I am innocent "... but perhaps that person is where he is thanks to you!
