Una parola che è ricorsa continuamente è stata "giustizialismo". Siccome sono puntiglioso e mi sentivo toccato dove duole sono andato innanzitutto a controllare la definizione corretta del termine. Non si sa mai, ci si potrebbe sempre confondere...
Il buon De Mauro recita:
1 TS polit., dottrina e prassi politica che ispirarono il governo dell'uomo politico argentino Juan Domingo Perón (1895-1974), caratterizzate da un acceso nazionalismo e da un programma di riforme sociali con spunti anarchici e corporativi; estens., atteggiamento o movimento politico populistico e antiparlamentare
2 CO nel linguaggio giornalistico e politico, tendenza a utilizzare la magistratura come strumento per conseguire obiettivi politici
Non sono uno studioso di storia. Non conosco Peron. So a malapena che su sua wife has written a musical. It 's true, I'm ignorant, but those who spoke for Lerner are perhaps even more than me, because the words used inappropriately. But back to the point: I doubt that Peron has to do something with it. I doubt also that we can even remotely support that Di Pietro has anti-parliamentarian attitudes. Populists, according to some.
But I feel I can say that the term "justicialism" was used in transmission within the meaning number 2, saying that Di Pietro is one who wants to use the judiciary (and the courts and processes) as a tool to achieve political objectives.
Good.
In my opinion, saying that criminals should stay in jail is not justicialism. It 's the basis of legality. The very foundation of the minimum, without which we can no longer say that there is justice (for men) in our country. If political objective means of making offenders go to jail, well, 'then I think a more than legitimate policy objective and that, necessarily, must pass for the judiciary to be realized. But there is a
I doubt not that those who accuse Di Pietro justicialism actually think that criminals should stay in jail there?? Or at least some offenders against whom Di Pietro rages?
0 comments:
Post a Comment